|
|
|
|
- Readme First! - Read and follow the rules, otherwise your posts will be closed |
|
|
|
|
|
There are currently, 363 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here |
|
|
|
|
|
| The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
| | | | |
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register | | | | |
Re: (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Sunday, February 09 @ 01:40:15 CET | You raise valid issues. Nuke has gotten bloated with patch worked code. But no one can institute changes to the nuke core and still call it phpnuke but FB. Presently he has made a change in the right direction somewhat. Yet the heavy patching remains. PHPNuke itself is as safe or safer then many of the open source php applications out. Follow Bugtraq and one is amazed at the low level exploits that can invade many php freeware, shareware and propriety apps. I feel ZX, and Tom have earned a mutual repect from FB that has benefited us all greatly. I hope that he will continue to accept assistance from willing and able coders such as these fine gentlemen. Teamwork has moved nuke farther in the last year then it has for some time.
|
| Parent | | | | |
Re: How secure is PHP-Nuke? (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Wednesday, February 26 @ 17:16:55 CET | I have to agree. I came to find out "how secure is php-nuke?" and learned instead how insecure other alternatives are.
Has anyone actually sat down to audit php-nuke's security? I'd love to see a real evaluation before I decide whether or not to use the software. |
| Parent | | | | | |
|