|
- Readme First! -
Read and follow the rules, otherwise your posts will be closed |
|
|
|
|
|
There are currently, 330 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here |
|
|
|
|
|
Jaguar PC's Shared Hosting not good for Nuke Sites? |
|
 help writes "I heard that Jag PC's dedicated server works well for Nuke Cops and that's the main reason why I transferred my nuke site to this host because I thought that it would be the same for their shared hosting service.
But it's a different story for their shared hosting. I've registered an account with Easy Monitor which monitors your server for free every 15 minutes for downtime. Look at my site's history table. You see how frequent the downtime is and more importantly the duration of each. 2 hours and 26 minutes at one point, man that's ridiculous.
All their technical support says is that they are very sorry and they apologize for the inconvenience.
My previous host was better as far as uptime is concern.
I hope this gets posted to remind those nuke webmasters to choose their web host carefully before planning to transfer their sites."
|
|
Posted on Saturday, October 04 @ 21:44:23 CEST by Zhen-Xjell |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Average Score: 3.66
Votes: 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
| | | | |
| No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register | | | | |
Re: Jaguar PC's Shared Hosting not good for Nuke Sites? (Score: 1)
by NovemberRain on Sunday, October 05 @ 20:37:19 CEST
(User Info | Send a Message) | I think JagPC also have problems with their network, maybe not partnered with international isps i don't know. Nukecops is very slow, it may be ok in U.S but i'm in Europe and it is really slow for me.
I am going to buy a dedicated from nocster.net for my site. Their network and prices are great. |
| | | | |
Re: Jaguar PC's Shared Hosting not good for Nuke Sites? (Score: 1)
by Zhen-Xjell on Saturday, October 04 @ 21:47:46 CEST
(User Info | Send a Message) http://castlecops.com | | I've offered to help upgrade their CPanel version of PHP-Nuke but it hasn't transpired yet. The owner of JagPC means very well for the company and its customers, but they are going thru growing pains. Right now I lease their best dedicated server, but hopefully come next year I'm going with colocation services. Its like anything else that is relatively young, there are growing pains to contend with. Which server do you reside on over on their shared boxes? In my case, for a whole month the server was going offline on a daily basis. Turned out that CPUs were overheating. Finally new heat sinks solved that problem and the box has been up for over 25 days now. |
| | | | |
Re: Jaguar PC's Shared Hosting not good for Nuke Sites? (Score: 1)
by VinDSL on Sunday, October 05 @ 08:19:43 CEST
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.lenon.com/ |
I'm hosted at JagPC as well, and all I can tell you is it depends on what server you are on, e.g. who your neighbors are. It's luck 'o the draw, and I guess you lost...
If some jerk in the next partition is experimenting with crontabs, or whatever, on your shared production server, sure it's gonna go down every 2 hours, but that isn't JagPC's fault, is it? If JagPC catches them, they'll suspend their account[s]. What else can they do? This is the nature of mass webhosting. There is always some idiot messing it up for everyone else, you know?
Here's the uptime for my JagPC server:
$ uptime
12:19pm up 65 days, 17:36, 0 users, load average: 0.22, 0.36, 0.24
Here's my web site on JagPC if you wanna check it out: Lenon.com [www.lenon.com] |
Re: Jaguar PC's Shared Hosting not good for Nuke Sites? (Score: 1)
by defendtherealm on Sunday, October 05 @ 09:30:00 CEST
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.fastvds.net |
Shameless plug for fastvds.net
Come and use my virtual dedicated servers.
No matter what other people get up to, it's almost impossible for them to bring down your VDS.
In the rare event that they succeeded in taking up too much CPU the software would restart all the VDSs on the server as a last resort.....the server would be back up before you noticed it was down.
I can dish out virtual dedicated servers on 1 a month trial basis with no payments down. You have nothing to lose.
www.fastvds.net
sales@fastvds.net
|
]
Re: Jaguar PC's Shared Hosting not good for Nuke Sites? (Score: 1)
by Jeruvy on Monday, October 06 @ 08:54:27 CEST
(User Info | Send a Message) | If some jerk in the next partition is experimenting with crontabs, or whatever, on your shared production server, sure it's gonna go down every 2 hours, but that isn't JagPC's fault, is it?
Well then who's fault is it? OF COURSE it's there fault. If another site was playing havoc with my site I would move. Tell them this is not acceptable. Move! Millions of hosts out there (and most are poorly operated) so keep going till you find a decent one, or at least one that will listen.
J.
|
]
Re: Jaguar PC's Shared Hosting not good for Nuke Sites? (Score: 1)
by mattsiegman on Monday, October 06 @ 17:09:45 CEST
(User Info | Send a Message) http://mattsiegman.com | Obviously, you have never had an account at Jaguar. Their support is top notch, and if there is a problem with the server your on, it is normally fixed within 24 hrs or less.
Users with scripts gone wild are a problem on all servers. You can't really blame the host, but you also can. Jaguar does an excellant job of keeping the problems with insane scripts down.
Jaguar listens to its customers, even if it is not convenient. When they moved fromDI and VDI to their own NOC, they asked users whether they would like a couple days of total, hard downtime, or a gradual transfer. The users picked a gradual transfer. This caused headaches for everybody, but its what the customers wanted.
Please do some research before you blindly accept testimony from somebody shooting their mouth off. My site there hasn't been down for nearly a year -- partially because I know what I'm doing and don't overload the server with complex scripts that could potentially break it, partially because the other users on my server don't run stupid scripts that break things, and partially because Jaguar rocks at keeping servers running.. |
]
Re: Jaguar PC's Shared Hosting not good for Nuke Sites? (Score: 1)
by Zhen-Xjell on Monday, October 06 @ 18:38:17 CEST
(User Info | Send a Message) http://castlecops.com | | Hello Matt! First time here? I don't recall seeing you post before. |
]
Re: Jaguar PC's Shared Hosting not good for Nuke Sites? (Score: 1)
by mattsiegman on Thursday, October 09 @ 23:37:43 CEST
(User Info | Send a Message) http://mattsiegman.com | | Yeah, I had to join to post that :) I've decided this site is interesting. |
]
| | | | | |
