|
|
|
|
- Readme First! - Read and follow the rules, otherwise your posts will be closed |
|
|
|
|
|
There are currently, 530 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here |
|
|
|
|
|
| The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
| | | | |
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register | | | | |
Re: PHP-Nuke and Xaraya by Gregory Remington (Score: 1) by Zhen-Xjell on Wednesday, February 19 @ 21:46:19 CET (User Info | Send a Message) http://castlecops.com | The point you serve us in terms of clustering a great example is Google. They are the biggest search engine available publicly indexing millions of sites. |
| Parent | | | | |
Re: PHP-Nuke and Xaraya by Gregory Remington (Score: 1) by KnowBody on Wednesday, February 19 @ 23:30:55 CET (User Info | Send a Message) | >Well, its all depend on the concurrent user. You could have >50000 or 100000 employee but how many of them hit the site at the same time? Cause even the best Linux server running Intel can't handle more then 200 user concurrently. Maybe SUN solaris can handle more. But again Clustering might be another solution. Or maybe they will require a LoadBalancing hardware.
Yep,
that's exactly the point. And scaling a *.nuke system is not that easy. Clustering a *.nuke WITHOUT heavily modifying the system is not possible. And then you enter the maintenance hell. I'd already did some investigations in that direction. I'm not sure about Xaraya (TBD).
> But I believe Post Nuke could run with Oracle, since they used ADODB that support Oracle DB.
Theoritically you can. The core looks okay. But i've seen a lot statements in 3rd party mods that won't run on Oracle and some won't run MSSQL. There are no installation scripts for other DBs than MySQL provided. And then, ADODB is only used to connect to the database. Fullstop. Every sql statements i've ever seen in the *.nuke ignore the intention of using ADODB (me too, hehe). So, why do we need than a full blown ADODB if it's not used???
>I believe if you have problem with *Nuke then you need to consider from the hardware point of view, which sometime overlook by the management.
No. It's not that simple. It's an architectural issue that can not only be solved by buying better hardware. I believe it IS possible to build even larger site, but only with high efforts (and costs) and then i'm starting to think about a commercial alternatives. I guess, you as an IT director would do the same.
> Check out Source Forge for an example. I believe they should have more concurrent
> user than any companies intranet. But its still run quite strongly and fast.
Could be true, could be false. I don't know. I believe from the 50000 projects only 10% are active. But who cares ;-) It's NOT a *.nuke. Yahoo! has more CCU as far as i know.
So, it's time to go back to work. Must prepare the pnESP release.
Bye,
Andreas
|
| Parent | | | | | |
|